 | | RE: some information about timeout objects (was: Re: [dirGames-L]
KillChild fr | RE: some information about timeout objects (was: Re: [dirGames-L]
KillChild fr 2003-12-13 - By Thomas Higgins
Back
All,
So if I understand things it's definitely not that timeouts are "broken" as
was mentioned yesterday so much as it the situation is "use with care:
properly store and clear timeout object references using variable
assignment", right? I guess I'm just wondering where the "broken" part of
the equation comes into play. It just seems a bit dangerous for folks to go
around saying things like this when it's not really the case, or is it? I'm
still waiting to see how they're _broken_ in any way - you can freely and
_safely_ use them so long as you store the result of the timeout() function
in a variable, then call forget() off that variable and set it to VOID when
done.
Cheers,
Tom Higgins
Product Specialist - Director Team
Macromedia
DIRECTOR, de lekkerste!
...
__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____
dirGames-L mailing list - dirGames-L@(protected)
http://nuttybar.drama.uga.edu/mailman/listinfo/dirgames-l
Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.
|
|
|