Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
MUD Dev - Discussion of MUD system design, development, and implementation
Mac Game - Mac game development
Rivers of MUD - a Diku and Merc based multiuser dungeon
SMAUG
Subjects
Getting UDP through NAT/firewalls/whatever for a game
Getting UDP through NAT/firewalls/whatever for a game
QuickTime errors
Python script as stand alone MUD server
Various sound problems
Fragment Shaders & GL TEXTURE RECTANGLE EXT
Timers and global variables
Re: Language and platform for Text MUD server
Apparent acquisition of Yantis (mysupersales) by IDE
HID keyboard
Getting UDP through NAT/firewalls/whatever for a game
Microsoft Sparkle
Director MX
Congratulations Horizons
Yet more problems fullscreen mode
Apple Dev Kitchen Them 's tasty vittles, Maw!
NSOpenGLContext, Pbuffers, and drawables
More DCR "theft " naughtiness
dynamic sprite creation and imaging lingo
Re: Find stuff in Flash array?
Effects of skill imbalances?
QuickTime errors
Rom 2 4/Quickmud Enhancement/Bug fix
Working with XML files/CFURL
smooth scrolling/subpixel tweening
RE: (Ron help me?) Flash text
Flash Racing
MudDev FAQ 2
Browser based games
Installing GLUT
Special character in Flash XML
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
Utopian World (Removing access to entertainment)

Utopian World (Removing access to entertainment)

2003-12-17       - By Sheela Caur'Lir

 Back
From: "Corpheous Andrakin" <corpheous@(protected)>

> In your ideal world without "barriers" to entertainment (that also
> act as challenges to other people) what kind of world would you
> propose in order to make it attractive to all types of players as
> most developers at least attempt to do nowadays?

Given perfect technology and unlimited funding, I'd create a game
where the players would have the challenge of creating the world.

Obviously, some of it would be made already, but by and large I'd
like to see a virtual world formed by the players and not the
developers. Offcourse, such tools would be hellishly hard to make so
the average gamer could use them with ease.

> How would you attract the socializer and the achiever and the
> killer and the explorer all at the same time and give them all
> access to a game that let them choose how they wanted to be
> entertained?

By letting them attract eachother.

An explorer and an Achiever could work together on building new play
areas, while the socializers would try and get some trading places
and social centers brewing. The killer would enjoy the content
created by the others.

Offcourse, I've always thought that there's more than just the 4
archetypes. In fact, I think there's a 5th arcetype - Creators.

Or builders, painters, musicians, zone designers - Labelled as
Creators since that is what they do, they create stuff out of
nothing and the tools they have.

> Because unless they're playing a single player game everytime they
> logon, I can't see how it can be done without shafting one of the
> classes of players while boosting another at any given time.

Well .. IF you are using classes at all.

Using classes, make them so different that they supplement each
other instead of competing with each other. Keep it simple, then
balance is easy enough.


I once made a rather large and elaborate collaboration of my notes
on how I would make my "perfect" virtual world to the point where I
reckon I have enough material to make a game out of it. But it would
take an awesome amount of funding and lots of development time, so
never got farther than that.

----
Jens L. Nielsen
(aka. Sheela Caur'Lir)
__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@(protected)
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev

Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.